The gendered division of labor

閲覧数1,220
ダウンロード数8
履歴確認

    • ページ数 : 3ページ
    • 会員550円 | 非会員660円

    資料紹介

    I disagree with the gendered division of labor without a part of this thinking that the gendered division of labor. Because it is not rule that men work outside of the home, and women take care of the home and children. But only the women can give birth, so I think the women do that only the women can, and the men do that only the men can, and the others are done by who wants to do.
    For example, there is a family that has children. Only the mother, not the father, can bear a child. For working women, there is a double burden. So until mother bear a baby, she can get a maternity leave. While that period she can’t work. And the baby asks for a mother instinctively, however, she can also deposit with a nursery. I think the family that has babies or children, the mother must or should be in house for the mother’s milk and communications, however, the father takes care of the children when the children grows to some extent.
    I said above, there are what is possible by sex, and the thing which can’t do surely. But I don’t think that women should shut herself up in a house and they have to do only housekeeping and child-rearing without a work or hobby. The portion in my agreement is that division of labor except the gender.


    その他の資料http://www.happycampus.co.jp/docs/983431725001@hc05/

    資料の原本内容 ( この資料を購入すると、テキストデータがみえます。 )

    国際家族研究Ⅰ
    ~中間レポート~
    2.The gendered division of labor
    2.The gendered division of labor
    I disagree with the gendered division of labor without a part of this thinking that the gendered division of labor. Because it is not rule that men work outside of the home, and women take care of the home and children. But only the women can give birth, so I think the women do that only the women can, and the men do that only the men can, and the others are done by who wants to do.
    For example, there is a family...

    コメント2件

    trip1985 購入
    大変良い内容でした。要点が分かりやすく書かれてましたが、もう少し掘り下げても良かったと思います。
    2006/10/16 4:08 (17年6ヶ月前)

    lepuy11 購入
    よかったです。3 Page(s)とあったのでもう少し字数があると思ったのですが、十分です。
    2007/01/03 11:26 (17年3ヶ月前)

    コメント追加

    コメントを書込むには会員登録するか、すでに会員の方はログインしてください。